inteligr8/alfresco-community-repo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Alfresco/alfresco-community-repo.git synced 2025-07-31 17:39:05 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

RM-1273 - Added check to ensure that rules defined for the root of the file plan are not applied to unfiled, holds or transfers

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: https://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-enterprise/modules/recordsmanagement/HEAD@68319 c4b6b30b-aa2e-2d43-bbcb-ca4b014f7261
This commit is contained in:
Mark Hibbins
2014-04-30 11:24:10 +00:00
parent cbe0e084bd
commit 1a1df733d3
2 changed files with 50 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

54
rm-server/source/java/org/alfresco/repo/rule/ExtendedRuleServiceImpl.java
View File

@@ -21,8 +21,10 @@ package org.alfresco.repo.rule;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Set;
import org.alfresco.model.ContentModel;
import org.alfresco.module.org_alfresco_module_rm.fileplan.FilePlanService;
import org.alfresco.module.org_alfresco_module_rm.model.RecordsManagementModel;
import org.alfresco.module.org_alfresco_module_rm.record.RecordService;
import org.alfresco.module.org_alfresco_module_rm.security.FilePlanAuthenticationService;
import org.alfresco.repo.security.authentication.AuthenticationUtil;
import org.alfresco.repo.security.authentication.AuthenticationUtil.RunAsWork;
@@ -54,6 +56,9 @@ public class ExtendedRuleServiceImpl extends RuleServiceImpl
/** node service */
protected NodeService nodeService;
/** Record service */
protected RecordService recordService;
/**
* @param runAsRmAdmin true if run rules as rmadmin, false otherwise
*/
@@ -79,12 +84,20 @@ public class ExtendedRuleServiceImpl extends RuleServiceImpl
}
/**
* @param filePlanService file plan service
* @param filePlanService file plan service
*/
public void setFilePlanService(FilePlanService filePlanService)
{
this.filePlanService = filePlanService;
}
this.filePlanService = filePlanService;
}
/**
* @param recordService record service
*/
public void setRecordService(RecordService recordService)
{
this.recordService = recordService;
}
/**
* Init method
@@ -157,10 +170,10 @@ public class ExtendedRuleServiceImpl extends RuleServiceImpl
@Override
public void executeRule(final Rule rule, final NodeRef nodeRef, final Set<ExecutedRuleData> executedRules)
{
if (nodeService.exists(nodeRef))
{
QName typeQName = nodeService.getType(nodeRef);
QName typeQName = nodeService.getType(nodeRef);
if (nodeService.exists(nodeRef) && shouldRuleBeAppliedToNode(rule, nodeRef, typeQName))
{
// check if this is a rm rule on a rm artifact
if (filePlanService.isFilePlanComponent(nodeRef) &&
isFilePlanComponentRule(rule))
@@ -216,4 +229,33 @@ public class ExtendedRuleServiceImpl extends RuleServiceImpl
{
return ignoredTypes.contains(typeQName);
}
/**
* Check if the rule is associated with the file plan component that the node it is being
* applied to isn't a hold container, a hold, a transfer container, a transfer, an unfiled
* record container, an unfiled record folder or unfiled content
*
* @param rule
* @param nodeRef
* @param typeQName
* @return
*/
private boolean shouldRuleBeAppliedToNode(Rule rule, NodeRef nodeRef, QName typeQName)
{
boolean result = true;
NodeRef ruleNodeRef = getOwningNodeRef(rule);
if(filePlanService.isFilePlan(ruleNodeRef))
{
// if this rule is defined at the root of the file plan then we do not want to apply
// it to holds/transfers/unfiled content...
result = !(RecordsManagementModel.TYPE_HOLD.equals(typeQName) ||
RecordsManagementModel.TYPE_HOLD_CONTAINER.equals(typeQName) ||
RecordsManagementModel.TYPE_TRANSFER.equals(typeQName) ||
RecordsManagementModel.TYPE_TRANSFER_CONTAINER.equals(typeQName) ||
RecordsManagementModel.TYPE_UNFILED_RECORD_CONTAINER.equals(typeQName) ||
RecordsManagementModel.TYPE_UNFILED_RECORD_FOLDER.equals(typeQName) ||
(ContentModel.TYPE_CONTENT.equals(typeQName) && !recordService.isFiled(nodeRef)));
}
return result;
}
}