inteligr8/alfresco-community-repo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Alfresco/alfresco-community-repo.git synced 2025-08-14 17:58:59 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

REPO-1059: REST API: Invalid orderBy field direction is ignored (hence defaults to ascending rather than returning an error)

Browse Source 
- follow-on to r13055 to fix test fallout

git-svn-id: https://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-enterprise/alfresco/BRANCHES/DEV/5.2.N/root@130573 c4b6b30b-aa2e-2d43-bbcb-ca4b014f7261
This commit is contained in:
Jan Vonka
2016-09-12 13:14:00 +00:00
parent 7e85c8ac0f
commit 44f9d72d42
1 changed files with 13 additions and 10 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
source/test-java/org/alfresco/rest/workflow/api/tests/ProcessWorkflowApiTest.java
View File

@@ -1063,15 +1063,18 @@ public class ProcessWorkflowApiTest extends EnterpriseWorkflowTestApi
assertEquals(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST.value(), e.getHttpResponse().getStatusCode());
}
// sort on non existing sort order (default ASC is taken)
// sort on non existing sort order
try
{
paramMap.put("orderBy", "businessKey ASC2");
processList = processesClient.getProcesses(paramMap);
assertNotNull(processList);
assertEquals(3, processList.getList().size());
assertEquals(process3.getId(), processList.getList().get(0).getId());
assertEquals(process1.getId(), processList.getList().get(1).getId());
assertEquals(process2.getId(), processList.getList().get(2).getId());
fail("forbidden expected");
}
catch (PublicApiException e)
{
assertEquals(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST.value(), e.getHttpResponse().getStatusCode());
}
}
finally
{