code review changes

This commit is contained in:
cagache
2018-10-01 18:34:14 +03:00
parent 810879d51c
commit 690d55cf44

View File

@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ public class DispositionScheduleInheritanceTests extends BaseRMRestTest
"rma:recordSearchHasDispositionSchedule property should be true");
Assert.assertEquals(recFolder.getProperties().getRecordSearchDispositionActionName(),
CUTOFF_STEP,
"Disposition action should be retain and not cutoff for complete record");
"Disposition action should be cutoff and not retain for the record folder");
}
/**
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ public class DispositionScheduleInheritanceTests extends BaseRMRestTest
* - incomplete electronic record
* - complete non-electronic record
* Then both records should not have RS (rma:recordSearchHasDispositionSchedule property is set to false)
* and record folder inherits the RS from subCategory
*/
@Test
public void testMixedRSInheritanceWhenFirstParentHasRSOnFolders() throws Exception
@@ -287,5 +288,12 @@ public class DispositionScheduleInheritanceTests extends BaseRMRestTest
"rma:recordSearchHasDispositionSchedule property should be false for incomplete record");
Assert.assertFalse(nonElRecord.getProperties().getRecordSearchHasDispositionSchedule(),
"rma:recordSearchHasDispositionSchedule property should be false for complete record");
STEP("Check that recFolder inherits subCategory retention schedule");
Assert.assertTrue(recFolder.getProperties().getRecordSearchHasDispositionSchedule(),
"rma:recordSearchHasDispositionSchedule property should be true");
Assert.assertEquals(recFolder.getProperties().getRecordSearchDispositionActionName(),
RETAIN_STEP,
"Disposition action should be retain and not cutoff for the record folder");
}
}