mirror of
https://github.com/Alfresco/alfresco-community-repo.git
synced 2025-08-14 17:58:59 +00:00
Merged 5.2.N (5.2.1) to HEAD (5.2)
131408 mward: REPO-1348/REPO-1349: implemented checks to guard against invalid fields Explicitly rejects fields: id, guid and role git-svn-id: https://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-enterprise/alfresco/HEAD/root@132257 c4b6b30b-aa2e-2d43-bbcb-ca4b014f7261
This commit is contained in:
@@ -133,10 +133,28 @@ public class SiteEntityResource implements EntityResourceAction.Read<Site>,
|
||||
@WebApiDescription(title="Update site", description="Update the Share site")
|
||||
public Site update(String siteId, Site site, Parameters parameters)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Until REPO-110 is solved, we need to explicitly test for the presence of fields
|
||||
// on the Site object that aren't valid SiteUpdate fields. Once REPO-110 is solved,
|
||||
// the update method will take a SiteUpdate as a parameter rather than a Site
|
||||
// and only the correct fields will be exposed. Any attempt to access illegal fields
|
||||
// should then result in the framework returning a 400 automatically.
|
||||
if (site.getId() != null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
throw new InvalidArgumentException("Site update does not support field: id");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (site.getGuid() != null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
throw new InvalidArgumentException("Site update does not support field: guid");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (site.getRole() != null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
throw new InvalidArgumentException("Site update does not support field: role");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Bind valid fields to a SiteUpdate instance.
|
||||
final String title = site.getTitle();
|
||||
final String description = site.getDescription();
|
||||
final SiteVisibility visibility = site.getVisibility();
|
||||
|
||||
SiteUpdate update = new SiteUpdate(title, description, visibility);
|
||||
|
||||
return sites.updateSite(siteId, update, parameters);
|
||||
|
@@ -657,6 +657,44 @@ public class TestSites extends EnterpriseTestApi
|
||||
null,
|
||||
"Expected 400 response when updating "+site.getSiteId(), 400);
|
||||
|
||||
// Invalid fields
|
||||
// Check that id, guid and role are not silently ignored. This is until REPO-110
|
||||
// is implemented, since we currently have to bind to Site rather than SiteUpdate in
|
||||
// SiteEntityResource.update
|
||||
sitesProxy.update(
|
||||
"sites",
|
||||
site.getSiteId(),
|
||||
null,
|
||||
null,
|
||||
"{\n" +
|
||||
" \"id\": \"a-new-id\"," +
|
||||
" \"title\": \"Updated Title\"\n" +
|
||||
"}",
|
||||
null,
|
||||
"Expected 400 response when updating "+site.getSiteId(), 400);
|
||||
|
||||
sitesProxy.update(
|
||||
"sites",
|
||||
site.getSiteId(),
|
||||
null,
|
||||
null,
|
||||
"{\n" +
|
||||
" \"guid\": \"76ba60c1-f05b-406a-86a4-4eeb1bb49aaa\"" +
|
||||
"}",
|
||||
null,
|
||||
"Expected 400 response when updating "+site.getSiteId(), 400);
|
||||
|
||||
sitesProxy.update(
|
||||
"sites",
|
||||
site.getSiteId(),
|
||||
null,
|
||||
null,
|
||||
"{\n" +
|
||||
" \"role\": \"SiteConsumer\"" +
|
||||
"}",
|
||||
null,
|
||||
"Expected 400 response when updating "+site.getSiteId(), 400);
|
||||
|
||||
// Details should not have changed.
|
||||
Site fresh = sitesProxy.getSite(site.getSiteId(), 200);
|
||||
site.expected(fresh);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user