mirror of
https://github.com/Alfresco/alfresco-community-repo.git
synced 2025-07-24 17:32:48 +00:00
MNT-20250: Model updates not working for deployment in cluster (#37)
- added includeNewCheck to putAndCheckUpdate as a new optional parameter (default to false) - updated tests
This commit is contained in:
@@ -150,10 +150,24 @@ public final class DefaultSimpleCache<K extends Serializable, V extends Object>
|
||||
* @return <code>true</code> if the put resulted in a change in value, <code>false</code> otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public boolean putAndCheckUpdate(K key, V value)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return putAndCheckUpdate(key, value, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* <code>put</code> method that may be used to check for updates in a thread-safe manner.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param includeNewCheck if true then we include the new value in the check
|
||||
* @return <code>true</code> if the put resulted in a change in value,
|
||||
* or if includeNewCheck is true and the put resulted in a new value,
|
||||
* <code>false</code> otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public boolean putAndCheckUpdate(K key, V value, boolean includeNewCheck)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry<K, V> kvp = new AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry<K, V>(key, value);
|
||||
AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry<K, V> priorKVP = cache.asMap().put(key, kvp);
|
||||
return priorKVP != null && (! priorKVP.equals(kvp));
|
||||
|
||||
return (includeNewCheck && priorKVP == null) || (priorKVP != null && (!priorKVP.equals(kvp)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
|
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@
|
||||
<property name="tenantAware" value="false" />
|
||||
<property name="cacheStats" ref="cacheStatistics"/>
|
||||
<property name="cacheStatsEnabled" value="${cache.immutableEntitySharedCache.tx.statsEnabled}"/>
|
||||
<property name="allowEqualsChecks" value="true" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -132,6 +132,45 @@ public class DefaultSimpleCacheTest extends SimpleCacheTestBase<DefaultSimpleCac
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, null));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void putAndCheckUpdateIncludeNewCheck()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Put an initial value
|
||||
cache.put(101, "101");
|
||||
// Update it
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(101, "99101", true));
|
||||
// Check the value really was updated
|
||||
assertEquals("99101", cache.get(101));
|
||||
|
||||
// Precondition: no value for key 102
|
||||
assertFalse(cache.contains(102));
|
||||
// Put a value - and test the return
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(102, "102", true));
|
||||
assertEquals("102", cache.get(102));
|
||||
|
||||
cache.put(103, null);
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(103, "103", true));
|
||||
// Repeat the put, this should not be an update
|
||||
assertEquals(false, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(103, "103", true));
|
||||
|
||||
assertFalse(cache.contains(104));
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, null, true));
|
||||
// Repeat putting null - still not an update, as we had that value a moment ago.
|
||||
assertEquals(false, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, null, true));
|
||||
// Now an update
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, "104", true));
|
||||
// Another update
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, "99104", true));
|
||||
// Another update, back to null
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, null, true));
|
||||
// Not an update - still null
|
||||
assertEquals(false, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, null, true));
|
||||
|
||||
cache.remove(104);
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, "104", true));
|
||||
assertEquals(true, cache.putAndCheckUpdate(104, null, true));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Timer-based tests are not ideal. An alternative approach is to factor out the CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
|
||||
// call to a protected method, override that in this test class to return a mock and use the mock to check
|
||||
// that the Cache is being configured correctly, e.g. assert that expireAfterWrite(int, TimeUnit) is called.
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user